skip to main content
Back to Top

Redeveloping? Don’t touch the Sprinklers!

Mar 24, 2015

Owners who are redeveloping their property may be unaware of their ongoing obligations under Ontario’s Fire Code (O Reg 213/07 under the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997). If your redevelopment involves temporarily decommissioning a fire suppression system, like sprinklers, you risk being charged under the Act.

Article 6.5.1.2 of the Code requires sprinkler systems to be maintained in operating condition. If you disconnect the sprinklers, you must either have permission to do so or have made alternative arrangements to reduce the risk of fire.

One such alternative is to retain trained individuals to do a “fire watch.” These individuals will patrol the property regularly ensuring that the proper safety protocols are being followed and that the risk of fire is reduced. If you are going to implement a fire watch, you should contact the local fire department to ensure that you are following adequate protocols for your building and circumstances.

You can also avoid a charge by obtaining permission by way of municipal building permit. However, your permit must specifically authorize the temporary decommissioning of fire suppression systems. A city engineer must have signed-off on the redevelopment, taking into account the effect on fire suppression systems. Where specific approval has been provided for, a party won’t be charged with violating the Code.

Although for new buildings the permit regarding fire suppression systems is not required until after the initial stages of construction, a redevelopment that involves temporarily decommissioning existing fire suppression systems requires a permit addressing fire suppression systems in the first instance.

As of late, enforcers have been toughening-up ​on obligations to maintain fire suppression and detection systems. The owner is exposed to pretty hefty fines for a violation (maximum of $50,000 for an individual and $100,000 for a corporation). Officers and directors of the owner or building managers may find themselves charged as well when they were aware of the violating activities.

Related Lawyer

Recent BLawg posts

18th Annual NAIOP Greater Toronto REX Awards

Apr 24, 2019

Daoust Vukovich LLP was thrilled to be back again to sponsor the Office Lease of the Year Award at the 18th Annual NAIOP Greater Toronto REX Awards...

It's Always Better to Pay Under Protest Than Not Pay at All

Apr 11, 2019

The following scenario is common in the commercial leasing world:  A landlord delivers an invoice to a tenant for additional rent owing. ...

Ontario Superior Court Provides Guidance on the Strict Nature of a Time is of the Essence Clause in an Agreement of Purchase and Sale

Apr 01, 2019

A recent decision by the Ontario Superior Court provides some clarification on the strict nature of a time is of the essence clause in an agreement...

All content ©Copyright 2016 Daoust Vukovich LLP. All rights reserved. Law firm marketing | Cubicle Fugitive